Dacisch, 1ste-eeuw-vc, National History Museum of Romania. Foto Ing. Marius Amarie

Dacian sacrifice

G - FGC6624

Merovech overwint Attila in 451

Merovech defeats Attila in 451

HOME
G-FGC6624 originated 6200 BC. in Anatolia

It is generally accepted that the ancestors of this lineage then lived in Western Anatolia amidst other G clades.

They had concentrated there shortly before 6500 BC into three regions: the lake area near Antalya, the coasts on both sides of the Aegean Sea and in northwestern Anatolia around the Sea of Marmara, at Barcin Höyük.

G2a2a and G2a2b groups entered Europe around 6000 BC. They introduced agriculture there and a new type of pottery Linear Band Ceramics, LBK. This culture flourished in western Europe from 5300 to 4900 BC. Archaeological remains of a Neolithic village have been discovered on the Cannerberg, between Maastricht and Heukelom.

At the beginning of the Iron Age, around 2500 BC. the existing G population in Europe was replaced by a people from the Russian steppes. Their men were carriers of haplogroup R. Carriers of haplogroup G2a2a then disappeared.

*

Our ancestors most likely did not participate in the Neolithic expansion to Europe, but remained until about 1000 BC. in Anatolia. There our family then split into two lines. I call them here the Moldavian branch (Ramura familiei moldovenesti) and the Benelux branch.

arrow

G - FGC6624 got around 1100 BCE. two branches

splitting
Moldavia FGC6624*

The Moldova branch has G-FGC6624*. The asterisk indicates that only one family is known in this branch, the Ghemu family. Their ancestor probably came from the Byzantine Empire, now Turkey, in the eleventh century in a large group of people who all have haplogroup G. They were of the Eastern Orthodox Christian faith. They came before the later Islamic invasions. (1)

Benelux FGC6618

The Benelux branch has its own SNP, FGC6618. This is because it is further branched. The ancestor of this went to Gallia Belgica in Roman times. He may have been a legionnaire or a merchant. Three branches sprang from him at the beginning of the Middle Ages or in late Roman times, from which the Marres, Slootmaekers and Nolet families descend. They all live in the Maas valley, the first two around Maastricht, the Nolet family lives around Namur. (2, 3)

pijl schuin
The three branches
They originated in Roman times
splitsing in drie

Nolet

FGC34750

Morech

FGC6634

Slootmaekers

FGC42426

arrow

Split into two branches in the year 1490.
Fourteen generations in both lines.

splitting
Marres
FGC6628
Mares
BY220097

Haplotypes

DYS markers in a blue field - DYS values in light yellow - one genetic mutation more in beige - two in brown - one less in light green - two in green - more in dark green.

  Name     Clade   393 390 19a 19b 391 385
a
385
b
426 388 439 389
i
392 389
ii
446 459
a
459
b
455 454 447 437 448 449 464
a
464
b
464
c
464
d
460 GATA
  h4  
YCA
  IIa  
YCA
  IIb  
456 607 576 570 CDY
  a  
CDY
  b  
442 438 710
B. Marres FGC6628+ 14 22 15 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 11 20 20 15 14 17 18 33 40 11 10 40
G. Marres FGC6628+ 14 22 15 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 11 20 20 15 14 17 17 33 39 11 10 40
A. Mares BY220097+ 14 23 15 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 10 20 20 15 14 17 18 33 38 11 12 40
G. Mares BY220097+ 14 22 15 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 10 20 20 15 14 17 18 32 38 11 11 40
F. Nolet FGC34750+ 14 22 15 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 17 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 28 12 13 14 14 11 11 20 20 15 14 17 18 33 38 11 10 40
M. Slootmaekers FGC42426+ 14 22 15 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 18 9 9 11 11 23 14 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 11 20 20 15 14 17 18 33 37 11 10 40
V. Ghemu FGC6624+ 15 22 15 15 10 13 15 11 12 11 12 11 29 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 11 20 20 16 14 19 17 33 38 11 10 34

It was first established in the Marres family that the DYS19 can have a double equal value. Here DYS19 = 15 - 15. (3)

*

STR marker values tested at Full Genomes and assessed by YSEQ
at the three FGC6618+ :   Marres – Nolet – Slootmaekers

DYS markers in blue field   -   DYS values in yellow field   -   Not tested or no result in white field.
One unit higher in beige   -  two units higher in brown   -  one unit lower in light green   -  two units higher in green.

  NAME   393 390 19 391 385
a
385
b
426 388 439 389
i
392 389
ii
458 459
a
459
b
455 454 447 437 448 449 464
a
464
b
464
c
464
d
460 GATA
h4
YCA
IIa
YCA
IIb
456 607 576 570 CDY
a
CDY
b
442 438 531 578 395
S1a
395
S1b
590 537 641 472 406
S1
511 425 413
a
413
b
557 594 436 534 450 444 481 520 446 617 568 487 572 640 492 565
Marres 14 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 9 9 11 11 23 16 22 29 12 13 14 14 11 11 20 20 15 14 17 18 33 40 11 10 11 8 16 16 8 11 10 8 11 10 12 21 22 15 10 12 16 8 12 24 20 15 15 11 13 10 11 11 12
Nolet 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 9 9 11 11 16 22 29 12 12 13 14 11 12 20 20 15 14 17 18 11 10 8 16 16 8 11 10 8 11 10 0 20 22 15 10 16 8 12 23g 15 11 11 11 11
Slootmaekers 14 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 28 18 9 9 11 11 23 14 22 29 12 13 13 14 11 12 20 20 15 14 17 18 33 37 11 10 11 8 16 16 8 11 11 8 11 10 21 22 14 10 12 17 8 12 23g 20 15 11 11 11 12
The progenitor STR haplotype - Y14918 assessed by YSEQ
  FullGenomes   393 390 19 391 385
a
385
b
426 388 439 389
i
392 389
ii
458 459
a
459
b
455 454 447 437 448 449 464
a
464
b
464
c
464
d
460 GATA
h4
YCA
IIa
YCA
IIb
456 607 576 570 CDY
a
CDY
b
442 438 531 578 395
S1a
395
S1b
590 537 641 472 406
S1
511 425 413
a
413
b
557 594 436 534 450 444 481 520 446 617 568 487 572 640 492 565
Patriarchal 14 22 15 10 11 12 11 12 11 28 16 11 11 23 16 22 28 11 11 20 20 15 14 17 18 11 10 11 8 8 11 10 8 11 10 12 14 10 12 16 8 12 23g 20 15 13 11 13 10 11 11 12
Primordial 13 22 15 10 11 13 11 13 11 28 16 11 11 23 16 21 28 10 11 20 20 15 14 17 18 11 10 11 8 8 11 10 8 11 10 12 14 10 12 16 8 13 23g 21 14 13 11 14 10 11 11 12

*

The STR family tree of the Hasbania group
Geneagram-Marres-Mares-Nolet-Slootmaekers

In the Marres family, G and B have a common ancestor from 5 generations ago. They both have one mutation. Also expected is 1 to 2.

In the Mares family, A and G have a common ancestor from 10 generations ago. A has 4 mutations and G has 3. This is expected to be 3 or 4. This is correct.

The branches Marres and Mares have a common ancestor from 15 generations ago. The number of mutations is B 2, G 2, A 4 and G 3 mutations respectively. This is expected to be 5. This is clearly less for all.

The Mar(r)es, Nolet and Slootmaekers families have a common ancestor who lived between 30 and 60 generations ago. Over such a long time, counting the number of STR mutations becomes irrelevant due to convergence, i.e. parallel and reverse mutations. As a result, we see an apparently small number of mutations and an apparently small genetic distance.

TMRCA-Y Comparison tables Genetic Distance-Y Comparison tables

We see that over a period that can be described genealogically, the Genetic Distance with STR mutations provides good estimates. When the limit of 800 to 1000 years is exceeded, it appears to lose its value completely. Then SNPs become more useful, although they also appear to provide only a rough indication.

Haplogroup Story G-FGC662

The split from the Moldavia branch took place in 1150 BCE, according to FTDNA. (BCE means before Chr.) So that is 3000 years ago.

The Nolet and Slootmakers families branched off about 500 CE.

*

G-FGC6669 tree

The G-FGC6669 family tree

*

AUTOSOMAL DNA

Autosomal DNA is the total DNA of all chromosomes, it comes from all ancestors. The father and mother each gave about half of their DNA, they in turn each received about half from their parents. (7)

B.M. K36 Ancestry Report Geografcal 2018-800

With the mouse on the map there is an enlargement and a green dot on Maastricht.

The genome of the author mainly has genes in common with West Germans, especially people from Hesse and Baden-Württemberg, then mainly from southern Germany and Switzerland, followed by Walloons, Flemish people and northern French, and finally English people from the southeast of that country.

His ancestors all came from regions further south than Maastricht. The lower proportion of Limburgers is striking, as Brabanders are also poorly represented, as are other Dutch people.

*

GEDMATCH

This is a group of geneticists who perform the autosomatic tests for large companies. They searched for origins from thousands of years ago among the original inhabitants of Eurasia.

The oldest are the Altaic inhabitants who lived here on the tundra during the ice ages. After the Ice Ages some 10,000 years ago, the hunter-gatherers repopulated the European mainland from their Mediterranean refugia. The Neolithic farmers came from Anatolia 7,000 thousand years ago, and the Corded ware people came from the Caucasus 5,000 years ago. The Huns also left some traces.

Etnische herkomst B. Marres, Bron: GedMatch

*

The institute Gedmatch compares autosomal DNA with archaeological remains of hunter-gatherers and the first European Neolithic farmers. Below is a figure with the results in order of the established relationship with whom we share at least one CentiMorgan (measure of relatedness). (8)

In archaeogenetics, 1 cM is the lower bound for relatedness. The higher this number, the greater the relationship, so with more and thicker lines.

In the table below, we are most closely related to two Neolithic individuals who lived 7200 and 3200 years ago in what is now Hungary. They are closely followed by a 7,000-year-old discovery from Stuttgart, then a Luxembourger of 8,000 years ago. Then a 45,000-year-old find from Siberia and a North American Indian from 12,000 years ago. His ancestors must have crossed the Bering Bridge not long before.

Striking is the great genetic distance to the English, Scandinavians and Spaniards Here we hardly seem to have any common ancestors. We are least related to a Briton - at the very bottom - with whom we share segments of 1 or 2 cm in five places.

GEDmatch-1cM-c

*

Neanderthal genes

A nice test is the presence of Neanderthal genes. Our amount, depending on the testing lab, is estimated to be between 2.8% and 4.8%, with about 2/3 coming from Neanderthals and 1/3 from another pre-modern human species, the Denisovans.

schedels noderne mens en Neanderthaler

Two skulls, one of a modern man and one of a Neanderthal at the Natural History Museum in Cleveland.
I have applied bimaxillary prognathism to the Neanderthal.

If the mouse is over the image, you will see the original image (9)

*

The DNA of the Marres family

At the international congress for
Genealogical and heraldic sciences
held in Maastricht in September 2012

At this conference Dr. W. Penninx delivers the opening lecture. He discussed the variants in the Y-DNA of the different branches of the Marres family and how small mutations in the Y-DNA can reveal close and distant family relationships, which is impossible with genealogical and historical research alone.

When the mouse is over the image, you will see one of the slides

He shows family relationships going back to the Middle Ages and even to the Neolithic. The results of the DNA tests in the Marres family serve as an example.

The motivation for starting the genetic study was our goal to discover the expected but not yet proven genealogical relationship between the Dutch Marres and Mares families, if not then at least with to provide maximum certainty.

It has always been assumed that the Maastricht families Marres and Mares were two branches of one family. We have been able to demonstrate this relationship with DNA research.

When this goal was achieved, we used the genetic knowledge built up from this to trace our family history back to prehistoric times. With the collected facts, we hope to contribute not only to the national history of our country, but also to European and world history.

Many publications have appeared about the Marres family in genealogical and heraldic magazines. In one of them, De Nederlandsche Leeuw, 1990, the common origin of the Marres and Mares family is made plausible. (10)

The rise of DNA testing in this century offered a wonderful method to prove the genealogically assumed family relationship. Four men took part, two from the Marres family, Boed and Gilbert, and two from the Mares family, André and (the late) Guus. They participated in several projects. (11)


Author: E.C.W.L. (Boed) Marres, Amsterdam   —

last modified: